Revisiting 2013 AEA Conference

About a week ago, the global evaluation community was in Washington DC for the annual American Evaluation Association conference. As one of the largest voluntary organization of professional evaluators (VOPEs) in the world with a strong tradition of influencing evaluation theory and the future direction of the trade, the conference always attracts huge interests.

AEA estimates that 3000 people attended this year’s event. Close to 900 presentations were on schedule spanning the breadth and depth of the field of evaluation. As usual education and health evaluation dominated the agenda.

But perhaps one the main sub plots of this year’s conference is what we may term ‘climate change’ topical interest group (TIG). Panels focused on climate change evaluations attracted sizable crowds with in-depth discussions on salient evaluation challenges.

I could not attend all of them -- but thought that you might be interested in some of the sessions and perhaps might even want to contact some discussants and presenters for further information. Following are links to key sessions on climate change:

And so what was your experience with the AEA conference? What are some of the learning that you might want to share with us?

In the meantime, Climate-Eval took part in a session on online communities of practice and how they influence practice and learning.

Watch the recorded session on Online Evaluation Communities of Practice: Influencing Practice and Affecting Learning, courtesy SEA Change CoP

Click here to view our presentation.

Add comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Latest Blogs

What is Safe Monitoring and Evaluation Practice in the 21st Century?

Monitoring and evaluation practice can do harm. It can harm:

the environment by prioritizing economic gain over species that have no voice
people who are invisible to us when we are in a position of power
by asking for...

The GEF and Cleantech: Evaluating Efforts to Build an Innovation Ecosystem

Global factors such as technological advances, lowered costs, available capital, consumer demand and climate change have been encouraging the development and deployment of clean technologies as part of low...

Recent FAO evaluation highlights the role of GEF in programmes addressing integrated natural resource management for sustainable food and agriculture systems

In November 2018, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has released an evaluation of its contributions to integrated natural resource management for sustainable agriculture.

CIF Evaluation & Learning: What Are We Learning About the Big Issues in Climate Finance?

The scale and urgency of the climate crisis demands rapid action to prevent a range of consequences – from increased droughts and floods to huge economic losses and more extreme natural disasters.  

All major climate funds and...

Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change

“How the world deals with large and serious problems is almost certainly going to shape our collective future” is the second line – and a promising start – in this edited Springer volume titled...