Report Urges GEF to Continue Investment in Transport to Cut Co2 Emissions

New York-based nonprofit, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) has urged the Global Environment Facility to maintain investment in the transportation sector at the current rate as a means of cutting down on emissions of greenhouse gases. In a report: Maximizing the Effectiveness of the Global Environment Facility Sustainable Transport Portfolio published several weeks ago, ITDP states that “rapid economic growth and urbanization in developing nations spurs global demand for transport, a critical component of all economies. Transport accounts for nearly a quarter of global energy use and total transport energy use and carbon emissions are projected to grow 80 percent from 2002 levels by 2030. GEF can play a key role financing transformational initiatives that support improved mobility and access while curbing emissions.”

The report further examines selected GEF projects and offers recommendations for more effective GEF action in the transport sector. The paper addresses the proposed restructuring of GEF--‐6 and its Implications for future transport funding.

While commending the GEF’s transport portfolio for leveraging more money per dollar invested than any other within the climate change focal area (for every dollar invested, 12 dollars were leveraged), the report however highlights the fact that “the biggest impediments to successful GEF transportation project implementation are unclear or unrealistic project designs and difficulty in adjusting project design to a dynamic political environment following project approval.”

The report was developed before the GEF Council meeting which held in Washington in early November and the latest GEF Replenishment round which ended in Paris a few days ago.

Click here for full Report

Source of original article

Related Links:

Add comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Latest Blogs

What is Safe Monitoring and Evaluation Practice in the 21st Century?

Monitoring and evaluation practice can do harm. It can harm:

the environment by prioritizing economic gain over species that have no voice
people who are invisible to us when we are in a position of power
by asking for...

The GEF and Cleantech: Evaluating Efforts to Build an Innovation Ecosystem

Global factors such as technological advances, lowered costs, available capital, consumer demand and climate change have been encouraging the development and deployment of clean technologies as part of low...

Recent FAO evaluation highlights the role of GEF in programmes addressing integrated natural resource management for sustainable food and agriculture systems

In November 2018, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has released an evaluation of its contributions to integrated natural resource management for sustainable agriculture.

CIF Evaluation & Learning: What Are We Learning About the Big Issues in Climate Finance?

The scale and urgency of the climate crisis demands rapid action to prevent a range of consequences – from increased droughts and floods to huge economic losses and more extreme natural disasters.  

All major climate funds and...

Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change

“How the world deals with large and serious problems is almost certainly going to shape our collective future” is the second line – and a promising start – in this edited Springer volume titled...