Real-Time Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative

Launched in 2007, Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI) supports efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions resulting from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries known as REDD+.

Supporting the measurement, reporting, and verification (MVR) of emissions from forests in relation to REDD+ is part of the core work of NICFI. Under the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC), developing countries are to receive payments based on results achieved in reducing emissions through this scheme.

According to authors of this report, the scope of the evaluation is the NICFI MRV work track, which consists of four primary areas of support:

  • bilateral support through agreements with REDD+ countries (Tanzania, Guyana, Indonesia, Mexico, Ethiopia, Vietnam and Brazil1); 
  • multilateral support through the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD), Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) funding allocated to national MRV and reference level establishment, support to the Group on Earth Observations’ (GEO) Forest Carbon Tracking (FCT) initiative and to the Global Forest Observation Initiative (GFOI);
  • activities focused on MRV and reference levels in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) climate change negotiations (submissions to the UNFCCC, participation in UNFCCC meetings and workshops, the development of the Norwegian position, commissioning of ‘consensus building’ research); 
  • smaller scale of funding to MRV activities provided through grant schemes such as the Norad-managed Civil Society Support Scheme on REDD+.

Click Here for Full report

Add comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Latest Blogs

What is Safe Monitoring and Evaluation Practice in the 21st Century?

Monitoring and evaluation practice can do harm. It can harm:

the environment by prioritizing economic gain over species that have no voice
people who are invisible to us when we are in a position of power
by asking for...

The GEF and Cleantech: Evaluating Efforts to Build an Innovation Ecosystem

Global factors such as technological advances, lowered costs, available capital, consumer demand and climate change have been encouraging the development and deployment of clean technologies as part of low...

Recent FAO evaluation highlights the role of GEF in programmes addressing integrated natural resource management for sustainable food and agriculture systems

In November 2018, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has released an evaluation of its contributions to integrated natural resource management for sustainable agriculture.

CIF Evaluation & Learning: What Are We Learning About the Big Issues in Climate Finance?

The scale and urgency of the climate crisis demands rapid action to prevent a range of consequences – from increased droughts and floods to huge economic losses and more extreme natural disasters.  

All major climate funds and...

Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change

“How the world deals with large and serious problems is almost certainly going to shape our collective future” is the second line – and a promising start – in this edited Springer volume titled...