Climate Change Adaptation Indicator Good Practice Draft Study Report Available for Comments!

Dbours's picture

Over the past months I have been blogging about indicators, measures and metrics, some good discussion took place on various LinkedIn groups on counterfactual analysis beyond ‘no intervention’, maladaptation was touched upon in a blog post and we ended the month of October with discussions on indicator principles; SMART, CREAM and SPICED – and a variety of other principles were put forward by others!

All of these discussions have informed the good practice study on ‘Indicator Development, Selection and Use Principles for Climate Change Adaptation M&E’, on which I have been working together with my colleague Punji Leagnavar over the past three months. The study is commissioned by the Climate-Eval community of practice and undertaken by the Independent Evaluation Office of the Global Environment Facility.

At this point we proudly present to you the draft study report, which can be downloaded here.

The composition of the draft study report:

Part I: Introduction and Background first takes you through the study’s purpose and structure, after which the current discourse of climate change adaptation monitoring and evaluation is discussed in Chapter 2. Key M&E challenges in climate change adaptation are discussed, some of which are M&E specific, while others are adaptation-specific or adaptation-influenced. The various scales of interventions and their specific focus is discussed and this part ends with a small paragraph on the importance of having a clear picture regarding evaluation utilization from the onset of the M&E endeavor and how this informs your indicator development, selection and use.

Part II: Climate Change Adaptation M&E Frameworks and Classifications starts in Chapter 3 with an overview of commonly used climate change adaptation M&E frameworks, discussing their relevance towards the identification and development of indicator development, selection and use principles. Various indicator classification principles are discussed in Chapter 4, linking them to indicator purpose and evaluation use.

Part III: ‘Good Practice’ Principles for Developing and Selecting Climate Change Adaptation Indicators. Where the previous Chapters laid the groundwork for the good practice discussion, the following Chapters is where this discussion is taking place. Chapter 5 focuses on what constitutes a ‘good’ indicator, discussing a number of indicator principles and considerations to take into account at the onset of M&E planning. Good practice principles for selecting and developing climate change adaptation indicators are subsequently discussed in Chapter 6.
Chapter 7 completes this part with a matrix of assessment questions one should ask when formulating indicators.

Part IV: Policy Relevance and Conclusions starts with discussing the disconnect between evaluative evidence and policy-making in climate change adaptation. It provides a number of good practice principles to improve the uptake of evaluative evidence in policy making.
In the final report, Chapter 8 will be further expanded and a final chapter will be added that recaps the conclusions coming from the various chapters.

We’d appreciate your comments!

We would like to invite you to comment on this draft version of the ‘Good practice study on principles for indicator development, selection and use in climate change adaptation M&E’. Any comments received before December 24th 2014 will be taken into account in the development of the final report.
We would like to thank you in advance for your thoughtful feedback!

Add comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Latest Blogs

What is Safe Monitoring and Evaluation Practice in the 21st Century?

Monitoring and evaluation practice can do harm. It can harm:

the environment by prioritizing economic gain over species that have no voice
people who are invisible to us when we are in a position of power
by asking for...

The GEF and Cleantech: Evaluating Efforts to Build an Innovation Ecosystem

Global factors such as technological advances, lowered costs, available capital, consumer demand and climate change have been encouraging the development and deployment of clean technologies as part of low...

Recent FAO evaluation highlights the role of GEF in programmes addressing integrated natural resource management for sustainable food and agriculture systems

In November 2018, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has released an evaluation of its contributions to integrated natural resource management for sustainable agriculture.

CIF Evaluation & Learning: What Are We Learning About the Big Issues in Climate Finance?

The scale and urgency of the climate crisis demands rapid action to prevent a range of consequences – from increased droughts and floods to huge economic losses and more extreme natural disasters.  

All major climate funds and...

Rethinking resilience, adaptation and transformation in a time of change

“How the world deals with large and serious problems is almost certainly going to shape our collective future” is the second line – and a promising start – in this edited Springer volume titled...

Climate Change Adaptation Indicator Good Practice Draft Study Report Available for Comments! | Earth-Eval

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.